Lalit Modi, the architect of the Indian Premier League (IPL), has unveiled a harrowing chapter from his past, alleging that death threats from notorious gangster Dawood Ibrahim compelled him to flee India in 2010. In a candid conversation on Raj Shamani’s podcast, “Figuring Out,” Modi refuted claims that his departure was due to legal troubles, instead attributing it to severe threats against his life.
The Genesis of the Threats
Modi recounted that his stringent anti-corruption measures during the inaugural IPL season in 2008 attracted the ire of the underworld. He emphasized his unwavering stance against match-fixing, stating, “I was a very strict anti-corruption commissioner.” This uncompromising approach, he believes, led Dawood Ibrahim to target him.
A Narrow Escape
The situation escalated to a critical point when Modi’s personal bodyguard advised him to use a back entrance at the airport. There, Himanshu Roy, then Deputy Commissioner of Police, delivered a stark warning: “Lalit, we cannot protect you anymore. We’ve been given orders by the Center. There will be a hit on you, and we can only protect you for the next 12 hours.” Faced with imminent danger, Modi made the swift decision to leave the country that very night.
A Decoy Operation
To ensure his safe exit, a decoy strategy was employed. Modi’s motorcade, with someone impersonating him, departed from the Four Seasons Hotel in Mumbai, drawing media attention. Meanwhile, Modi was discreetly transported to the airport by a friend and a political ally, facilitating his untraceable departure.
Previous Confirmations
These revelations align with past reports. In 2010, Mumbai Police confirmed that Modi had received threats from Chhota Shakeel, a close associate of Dawood Ibrahim. Investigations revealed that Modi was targeted for refusing to pay extortion money, leading to plans for an attack during his family vacation in Thailand.
Implications of the Revelation
Modi’s disclosure sheds light on the perilous nexus between sports administration and organized crime in India. It underscores the challenges faced by officials striving to uphold integrity in the face of formidable threats. This account also provides context to Modi’s abrupt relocation to London, a move that had previously been shrouded in speculation.
Conclusion
Lalit Modi’s account offers a glimpse into the grave dangers that can confront those challenging corruption within influential sectors. His experience serves as a poignant reminder of the enduring influence of criminal elements in sports and the critical need for robust protective measures for those championing transparency and integrity.
